👉 Linking Theory with Real Practice
This section evaluates how
established HRM and organisational behaviour theories align with the real
organisational issues observed at Prime Land Pvt Ltd, specifically related to
onboarding, training, and employee development. The analysis highlights clear
gaps between theory and practice, demonstrating why inconsistent employee
performance and early-stage stress continue to occur in the company.
6.1 Social learning theory
and shadowing system of Prime land.
According to the Social Learning Theory by Bandura
(1977), people acquire behaviours by watching humans and imitating their
behaviour. Prime Land has strongly depended on a shadowing-based technique in
the onboarding processes whereby the recruits accompany senior sales executives
to understand how to handle customers, prepare documents and how to negotiate.
The learning is however inconsistent because Prime Land does not have formal
guidelines. Elderly or erroneous behaviours as exhibited by seniors are usually
emulated by the employees and this accounts to the alert made by Bandura that
unguided observational learning may be used to pass the wrong behaviours. This
leads to different sales procedures, gaps in communication and documentation
mistakes.
6.2 Human Capital
Theory and Training: an Investment.
The Human capital Theory (Becker, 1993) suggests
that an investment in the knowledge and skills of the employees leads to direct
improvement of productivity and performance of the organisation. The sales
personnel employed in the real estate industry are trained to participate in
the satisfaction of customers and conversion of sales.
At Prime
Land:
·
Very little investment is
done in systematic development.
·
Training is regarded as an
expense and not a strategy.
·
Employees are not confident
to deal with complicated customer inquiries and legal demands.
Other competitors like the Blue mountain properties and the Capitol
developers invest in constant competence acquisition and have better conversion
rates. This helps Becker prove that training is more than an investment that
can be measured and it is paramount in keeping up with competition.
6.3
Competitive Advantage and Resource-Based View (RBV).
According to the Resource-Based View (Barney, 1991), the valuable, rare
and inimitable resources constitute the source of sustainable competitive
advantage. This definition includes a professionally trained knowledgeable
sales force.
At Prime Land:
·
The expertise of different
branches differs.
·
Knowledge is not
standardised or written.
·
When the older employees
retire, the knowledge goes with them.
This means that there is a low internal capability base. On the other hand, companies like JKH Properties have institutional training models which generate long term and unrivalled labour force wealth. RBV justifies the need to institutionalise training as a strategic resource in Prime Land.
6.4 Gaps
to Onboarding Best Practice Theory and Gaps at Prime Land.
According to Bauer (2010), there are four key components of a successful
onboarding compliance, clarification, culture, and connection.
At Prime Land:
·
Compliance: Policies are not
effectively documented and are communicated orally.
·
Explanation: The
expectations of the roles also vary across branches, and this makes it
confusing.
·
Culture: New employees are
not introduced and are not taught any organisational values or behaviour
expectations.
·
Connection: New employees
are reliant on the goodwill and accessibility of older generations to advise
them.
These loopholes are the reasons why there is stress, performance
differences and prolonged learning curves in the new employees.
6.5
Continuous Development Theory and Requirement in the Real Estate Sector.
According to Noe (2020), the development of employees is to be ongoing,
and a constant level of coaching, refresher courses, and skill testing are to
be performed. The jobs in the area of real estate sales demand a modern
understanding of the rules, the methods of negotiations, the tools of selling,
and the ethical sales approaches.
Prime Land, however:
·
Does not offer any refresher
training.
·
Lacks no formal coaching
program.
·
Discontinues employee
development once they are on board.
This causes performance of employees to stabilise with time and the
organisation finds it difficult to sustain service levels between branches.
References
Bandura, A. (1977) Social
Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Barney, J. (1991) ‘Firm resources
and sustained competitive advantage’, Journal of Management, 17(1), pp.
99–120.
Bauer, T. (2010) ‘Onboarding new
employees: Maximizing success’, SHRM Foundation’s Effective Practice Guidelines
Series, pp. 1–44.
Becker, G.S. (1993) Human
Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. 3rd edn. Chicago: University
of Chicago Press.
Noe, R.A. (2020) Employee Training and Development. 8th edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hi thanks for this comprehensive analysis. I wonder if you might consider including Job Characteristic Theory in your framework. Given how much the performance and motivation of employees rely on their work conditions especially in dynamic fields like real-estate sales or service sectors designing jobs so they offer variety, clear responsibility, autonomy, significance and regular feedback could strengthen both employee satisfaction and output quality. It might also help reduce mistakes, boost engagement, and make ongoing training and development more effective.
ReplyDeleteThis is an excellent and insightful suggestion that adds meaningful depth to the discussion. Integrating Job Characteristics Theory would indeed strengthen the overall framework by highlighting how core job dimensions—such as skill variety, autonomy, task significance, and feedback—directly influence employee motivation, satisfaction, and performance. In dynamic environments like real estate sales or service sectors, these elements can significantly enhance role clarity, reduce errors, and boost engagement, ultimately complementing and amplifying the impact of training and development initiatives. Your point effectively broadens the focus from skill enhancement alone to the structural design of work itself, offering a more holistic and strategically aligned perspective on improving organizational outcomes.
DeleteYour description makes it very evident how Prime Land uses the Social Learning Theory. Employees learn by watching others, according to Bandura (1977), and you accurately note that while shadowing, new hires mimic the actions of senior staff members. But in the absence of clear standards, they could also pick up poor habits that result in uneven sales techniques and mistakes (Bandura, 1977). The true danger of depending solely on informal learning is brought to light by your analysis. In order to guarantee that proper behaviors are acquired and performance stays constant throughout the company, systematic training should be implemented.
ReplyDelete